Year: 1998 Genre: Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi Director: Peter Weir Starring: Jim Carrey, Laura Linney, Noah Emmerich
Description: Insurance salesman / adjuster finds his life is actually a TV show. Review: Ashaming the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences never realized what a brilliant actor Jim Carrey really is. It has no explanation for not getting an Oscar for The Truman Show, there is no excuse for not even nominated her for the show Truman and the moon. I love the Oscars, most of the time she is very beautiful, but this year it was a disaster. How else to explain that in the year of Saving Private Ryan, The Thin Red Line, and of course the movie The Truman Show most boring and joyless all time Shakespeare in Love becomes eight, I repeat, eight Academy Awards and shows Truman become? I think it's because Jim was a comedy, no one really knows what comedy is hard work means. It's Academy ashaming sometimes still driven by outdated prejudices. For me, Jim Carrey is the largest and most versatile actors in the world! And to show the performance of Truman greater actor I've ever seen on screen. Finish!
Year: 2012 Genre: Comedy Director: Larry Charles Starring: Sacha Baron Cohen, Ben Kingsley, Anna Faris
Description: Heroic story of a dictator who risks his life to ensure that democracy would never come to the country he so lovingly oppressed. Review: I usually do not know for movies that avoid explicit and crude humor including because its just not my cup of 'tea. So right off the bat I was expecting to be completely terrible scannána ... Nila know if it was my low expectations before the screening, but I really enjoyed the movie very much. In order to enjoy this film, however, you just detach yourself from thinking too much of the wealth of raw humor and racism in Film = n. But the dictator is satire, it's a fun movie to the real world, and if you let him, he tells you (and need = ire) in their thinking and racial stereotypes usually = not daily. Yes, he staged a bizarre and obvious, but overall, I think it is substance and it was very funny. Add Victorian influence on the place for one night and have a good laugh. See it.
Year: 2011 Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi Director: Joe Johnston Starring: Chris Evans, Hayley Atwell, Hugo Weaving
Description: After being deemed unfit for military service. Steve Rogers volunteers for a top secret research project that turns him into Captain America, a superhero dedicated to defending American ideals Review: Joe Johnston has done it again, and managed to take what should be a big step recycling material and managed to do that, well, boring.Dont get me wrong, the movie started out pretty well. change from super hero puny wimp to be doing well, as was the intro sequence and red skull. All the mysteries of Nazi mysticism-it is done well. But it seems that after Joe Johnston film two or three well thought-out part, the rest of the movies was just filler.I caught myself looking at me a few times, just kind of want the film to end - and this was the halfway stage of the film. Action sequences are fairly average for most and I really never had the benefit of the chair of my emotions as the characters face in all peril.All, above average film that could be as large as a man chops are best chosen .6/10
Year: 2012 Genre: Crime, Thriller Director: Andrew Dominik Starring: Brad Pitt, Scoot McNairy, Richard Jenkins
Description: Jackie Cogan is an enforcer hired to restore order after three stupid people mob-protected card game, robbing a local criminal economy collapses. Review: This film was made in a style that was completely unique from your standard affair shoot em up or Scorsese film criminal in many ways I found refreshing. This slowed down the pace of the dialogue scenes relatable and credible level of violence more realistic, and not too much his music. People can not handle too much or too realistic violence will feel like movie dialogue movie.Some do drag a little, but if he performs like diving, theyve made it feel like you can sitting in a real conversation. Scene and cut them long, but relatively constant makes it really bastards congestion in character. James Gandolfini seemed to chatter a bit much, but I think it was point.The violence can be summarized as hard-nosed, many of which can be difficult to achieve defined in the Hollywood stereotype played out?. There are no heroes in this film as a director by using cheap tricks like dubbing, excessive screen time, or Music Happy is convinced that a criminal cheering on the other. There is no celebration or violence dyabolize, as shown net of music and the audience can decide for themselves what is in the picture. There is no style Shootouts Schwartzenegger, because violence is usually sudden, but rough and loud. Each shot is closer than they as loud as real life, so a little ball of each shot, like the use of music also plays range.The gun down or important, therefore, that the violence and dialogue clearly. Some music to film some energy, but generally far less than the average Hollywood movie. This adds an element of tension as the music is not to give away what you want to happen in each scene (like movies and music menacing when something bad happens, etc.). The lack of music also allows viewers semblance of neutrality, which is observation, characters may be sympathetic, without being good. This is the type of movie that you would expect if they had removed the hero, and you only had the bandits and criminals, who remain - it's a lot less boring.
Description: A cop has to talk to a bank robber after the criminal assault perfect spiral with a hostage situation. Review: Note: I stayed away from describing the plot in any detail because it would be impossible to do so without destroying its elements. Inside Man starts out as no holds barred, high-octane action-thriller, and this transforms into a Middle completely clean, movie tongue-in-cheek heist, reminiscent of Sting. I felt a little over-plot, but has Ghana - unexpected twists and turns are all here, thankfully most unexpected way. Contrivances abound, and we do not really know the history of the Heist (ie. how can they learn about their target) but the story and overall atmosphere more than make up for it. plot meticulously designed also compensates for the lack of real 3D explanation - except for Denzel Washingtons ambitious police hero, at least to the level of human achievement in the story. interaction behavior between him and his best friend (Chiwetel Ejiofor popularity Stability) and frustrated captain played by Willem Defoe is excellent and some conversation sparkling. Clive Owen is right, most of the time convincing as mastermind criminal, although he takes over the film wearing a mask. I'd say this film is harmless fun, not your typical Spike Lee fare, which goes to prove his courage. Measuring the back-story on some issues in the past, but it was not more successful macguffin that just some little importance in the resolution of the movie. There is a neat trick the guise designs flash-forward, hinting towards Heist results without giving the actual ending. Used sparingly and smarter. I highly recommend this movie, it was never boring at the moment, what's more, I was enjoying it so much as one goes towards the summit, I wish it would go for. And that is very rare for me to film these days.
Description: Three friends are asked bridesmaids at the wedding of a woman they used to ridicule in high school. Review: I think a lot of people affected change Flack giving the film, because in contrast with bridesmaids. That's the problem with film buffs. We call on every movie, neighbor, or an imitation, or worse or better. By itself, Bachelorette did really well. A comedy film / dark vulgar but also do. It is not common in Hollywood movies that you women are as complex as humans. Some reviews state that will be redeeming characters, but I think this is what makes it strong Bachelorette. We have 3 complex, intriguing, and yes, messed up individuals. What gives this comedy is very plausible. An online magazine called the mix between Middle + girls Bridesmaids. Apart from the story like marriage, this is the female version of The Hangover and merged with girls Media. Check it out, it's a beautiful ride laugh if you are dark comedies.
Year: 2012 Genre: Horror, Thriller Director: Rob Zombie Starring: Sheri Moon Zombie, Bruce Davison, Jeff Daniel Phillips
Description: Heidi, radio DJ, sent to the box containing the record - a gift from the Lords. Sounds ducts causing memories of his past violent cities. Heidi expresses mad, or Lords are back to take revenge on Salem, Massachusetts? Review: If you are a fan of Rob Zombie and fit. Maybe so if you're a fan of Rob Zombie last increase in such territory is a bag of mixed results, to work mainly in my opinion. Center on the Salem radio host, Heidi Hawthorne sent a recording of a local band called Lords. Once the music on a strange trance, seductive cities placed on the female population. And Heidi starts even strange events such terrible visions and strange supplements apartment near her experience. The film you see is about witches. But witches and literature displays are populated YA lately they are old school hardcore, nasty, very nasty dirty witch, medieval. It all culminates in a moment dreamesque final fever, disturbing and even make you chuckle a bit. Rob Zombie is proud of creating a strong atmosphere, smoke age. The film is saturated with grainy film so as to act as an end-saturated old school 70's horror movie dripping with mood and electric blue neon red color. The film is beautifully shot with smooth panning and inventive angles and everything is fantastic with a well-equipped Trance mixed. But no big deal, and most of it has to do with limited budget movies. Zombie seeking work low budget film production, but only about 2.5 million too much of a feat, and in fact it is ambitious stunt inevitable financial constraints rinse his creative workload Ren. And although whimsical and creepy in places you can not help but giggle at the video more special effects sequences that come from the hammy and fake looking. As usual, the performances are pretty solid across the board. Many people have complained to his wife in the lead, but she does pretty well with it, although it is a bit limited overall development of their characters and their experience. Meg Foster truly remarkable here with wonderful witch sisters Dee Wallace Stone and Patricia Quinn, Judy Geeson as witches lead. She is looking for a terribly long cry from her roles strange but seductive seductive as bad in 80 Lynn Masters of the Universe and living, but have committed wholeheartedly. It is absolutely awful in a word. And overall the film takes up quite well. It starts very strong and stops him. But movies last third when it occurs in a somewhat expected hallucinatory state is just a little too crazy and tacky looking. It has a budget of more, who knows, he said. Nor is what is original, with the work expected tributes Italian horror maestro Dario Argento and etc, and that is something really praiseworthy today. For better or worse, and never seen a movie like this and I will always show up and buy a ticket if they saw anything attached zombie name. 3.5 / 5
Year: 2013 Genre: Action, Crime, Thriller Director: Taylor Hackford Starring: Jason Statham, Jennifer Lopez, Michael Chiklis
Description: Code of ethics and professional thief with a single company, twice crossed and left for dead. Adopted a new dress and is unlikely to form an alliance with a woman inside, and abused like going to the flight crew, the latest looting. Review: Parker, known any other movie where Jason Statham ... but this time with ten liters. I will not go into a detailed analysis, so if you see a Jason Statham movie you've seen all the movies of Jason Statham. Do not believe me? Here are some general trends I've noticed in his other films are also present in this one: 1. Obligatory scene when he escapes from the hospital Minutes After The Wake of death, beaten and / or wrinkled bear - check. 2. Semi-anonymous hero, is just ridiculously badass no apparent reason - check. 3. Regardless of the questionable activities he participates are explained to the public as a way to honor one gets dirty on purpose, as you know, has the JS code and it follows that automatically makes appropriate to the offense - check. 4. Women are magnetically forced his unwanted by his mere presence - check. Fast cars and fancy why. (No, I did not forget the rest of the offerings) - check. 5.Walking around, seemingly unconcerned with broken appendages, ribs, clavicle, multiple gunshot wounds, stab wounds penetrating and / or bear mace - check.All your entire movie Okayish if you never saw another Jason Statham movie yet but right now it's just stupid to keep throwing it in the same role in the same movie repeatedly. Obviously he is not a brilliant actor, but he has much more to offer than what is being agitated. Speaking of acting not realize I got Jennifer Lopez - WinCE his acting cause. Apparently the director thought the same way and took her in the film as an example of walking around the center shots, while Jason ended, presumably to make JS sympathizers men feel less awkward and an excuse about an erection throughout the film, as we all know, no matter how confident are.Its Bros. film completely forgotten, you probably will regret paying real money in the real world to see, because you'll feel like have you seen this movie, at least four other cases.
Year: 2008 Genre: Comedy Director: David Wain Starring: Seann William Scott, Paul Rudd, Christopher Mintz-Plasse
Description: Wild behavior forces a pair of energy drink repetition enroll in a Big Brother program. Review: Role Models - Two spokesmen of energy drinks, Danny and Wheeler (Seann William Scott and Paul Rudd) conflict with the law after Danny break-up with a Chaili = n (Elizabeth Banks is in everything these day). They are given the choice of prison or community service with troubled kids, and choose the latter. Danny is a boy Augie (Christopher Mintz-Plasse of Superbad), who wears a cape and role-playing games. Wheeler is a boy mouthed horror (Bobbe J. Thompson). Paul Rudd and Seann William Scott has a good chemistry. Dry sarcasm to spare Rudd and Scott plays a former sex addict numbskull. Their interactions are the two talented youngsters, sometimes funny and sweet. It Bobbe J. Thompson is one of the best child actors of his age and the nightmare of any teacher makes a cool little character, often wickedly funny. Christopher Mintz-Plasse, McLovin, or as he is known across America, essentially plays the same character, but sweet and shy and funny enough, less scary. So yes, it's too tight typecast as an asshole right now. But he's an idiot could very tasty and will help the image of idiots everywhere on the subhuman situation. I heard a lot of girls in the audience chruachási audience.A sensitive parts of the plot is contrived. But aside from some movie snobs, go-see comedy of the original plot? The most important thing for laughs, and this is when the movie gives. Directed by David Wain, manufacturer of Ten (funny cult movie), and written by Wain and Paul Rudd, the film is hilarious. The laughs were frequent and healthy. One of the elements that define the film is the portrayal of the role-playing games such as Dungeons & Dragons (This is known as LAIRE). The models are hand look even surprised. He mocks, of course (so easy). But it is also rooted respect. If the result is so lame impressive with the absurdity of D & D because of the gravitas of your average Hollywood blockbuster. The hilarious, and not look terribly here fun.And the scannána this position. Do what makes you happy, no matter what their parents or anyone else tells you. A stated in so many movies, how the message is false at this point. But Role Models great example of people doing what makes them happy, really rings true. You have to give a lot of people playing with foam swords in the forest due. They are doing what makes them happy. You can say the same for yourself? I can not right now.This film was delicious. Could be a bad year for movies, but it is an excellent drug for comedy. A-
Year: 2012 Genre: Comedy Director: David Wain Starring: Paul Rudd, Jennifer Aniston, Justin Theroux
Description: Rattled by sudden unemployment, provides alternative accommodation options in Manhattan couple finally deciding to try living on a rural commune where free love rules. Review: Yes, I had a few good laughs to be found in this movie. But for most, it's just weird. Even some funny scenes go too long and become painful. The story (if you can call it that) can be calculated. There were jokes, because it's so weird to come across a gimmicky.Not that such a film requires great acting skills, but the roles played Rudd, Aniston and Watkins least acceptable. But the credibility ends. Most of the other characters in addition to acting and bad developed.And one of the biggest pet peeves is NOT scenes from the trailer for the film. This sends me crazy! This properly is like an advertisement stock.Bottom dont Restaurant Lunch Special: Save your movie and save time.
19 
0
