Year: 2006 Genre: Drama, Thriller Director: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck Starring: Martina Gedeck, Ulrich Mühe, Sebastian Koch
Description: 1984 East Berlin, an agent of the secret police surveillance writer and his lover, finds himself increasingly worried about their lives. Review: Holy cow! What a great movie! I'm voting member of the Academy (actors branch), so I got all the free movies. Ive seen it all --- 60 movies. This was one of the last three films I've ever seen --- because I was completely familiar with the name. The film slowly squeezing me, but at the end of the handle is unrelenting. Lead actor who could carry out the life story of Peter Jennings, it was wonderful. Everything was wonderful. Welcome to the complete structure of the writers --- and for its seamless storytelling director --- and bring out the best performances from his actors. How good was that close. But now they are totally confused. Why port I heard about this movie? Where was this movie the Golden Globes? I have not yet seen any reviews about it. Nothing! What's going on? Im very active in the film business. I follow this stuff. This movie (I've never heard of) surprised me like no other film of all time. IMDb Note: This is not a spoiler. Jesse Vint III
Year: 2011 Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy Director: Kenneth Branagh Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston
Description: But the soldier is able to be proud to live among the people of Asgard Thor, cast out of the fantastic and sent into the field of the earth, where soon there may be one of the finest defenders. Review: The Torah was much, much better than I expected. I do not know if they can pull things out of balance between Norse mythology and the real world of the Marvel universe. I shouldve known as Marvel knows their characters and knows what we want to see. Spider-Man set a new standard for the genre of superhero movie back in the day. Iron Man upped the ante. Thor picking up the ball and run with it and places that bar even higher. I look forward to seeing him again, and I know that it is good enough to be a worthy successor, for the word of mouth is going to be great. Believe me when I say Thor is really as good as Iron Man, and the most worthy of being called one of the biggest adjustments ever.Chris Hemsworth as the Norse god Thor, and Tom Hiddleston as his common-brother Loki to show their acting ability and star quality mega big names in the future. Marvel two absolute diamonds. Both actors do a great impression and is great on the screen. You knew Acedemy winners Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman will bring, but this relative unkowns over their own on the screen. I know that the script is mostly written for them, but they do it in a big way. From what Ive read, Hemsworth and Hiddleston cast for almost a year before filming the story, so they had time to get in shape and do character studies. They have a few of these long wondered pride. Intelligent comic book popcorn epics are rare and this one is definitely a cut above the usual fare.
Year: 1992 Genre: Animation, Adventure, Comedy Director: Ron Clements Starring: Scott Weinger, Robin Williams, Linda Larkin
Description: Aladdin, a street urchin, accidentally meets Princess Jasmine, who is in the city undercover. They love each other, but she can only marry a prince. Review: I grew up watching this film and along with Beauty and the Beast, and Cinderella is one of my favorite Disney movies. I love it! Robin Williams is so good at it. Hes funny. The film just for children, but for the whole family. I think I was about 5 when I saw first, and on the 14th I still watch and this is my parents. I havent seen sequels because I heard that Robin Williams in them and decided that they would not as good without him. Do it for the part. The songs are amazing. I love singing along to a whole new world. Im hoping to get the soundtrack soon. I also loved the movie because I had the same name as a princess in it! I would definitely recommend it to anyone. Your never too old to watch a classic Disney movie.
Year: 1984 Genre: Comedy, Romance Director: John Hughes Starring: Molly Ringwald, Justin Henry, Michael Schoeffling
Description: A young girls sweet sixteenth birthday to be anything but special as she suffers every embarrassment possible. Review: It is immortal words sixteen candles heroine Samantha Baker (Molly Ringwald) in the ultimate '80s teen comedy. This image has become a classic for those born in the 70s, like me, and I believe now that guilty pleasure. Her film we all grew up with. Do not we all know someone like Farmer Ted, or hot blonde Queenie that he gets mad. It was fresh every young mans fantasy. This comedy is also a relic from the 80s, which is not all that dated.The jokes still work (as long as you can see uncut), and it is good to see things not so, distant past be displayed. Floppy disks, headgears, tights, etc. .. Time has not been so good for corporate management. Ringwald and Anthony Michael Hall, who was born to play this role, and this has all just gone. The largest stars are now blips on the screen here: Joan (the headdress) and John (geek) Cusack. The film is like a toy, you can not put away.Some conditions are beat, but at least Paul Dooley adds a new dimension to his . Too many of John Hughes teen comedies anxiety function era tissue thin parental figures. It was the first and best of the so-called kid pack film, and will always assert the 1980 film. Girls learned never to borrow their underwear to a geek, and we all learned that the high school is just a phase, easily forgotten As time progresses.
Year: 1999 Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy Director: George Lucas Starring: Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman
Description: Two Jedi Knights escape a hostile blockade bound to come across a boy and young people who can balance of power, but long dormant Sith re-align with the glory of his return dob.Dvije Jedi Knights escape a hostile blockade bound to come across a boy and young people who can balance of power, but long dormant Sith re-align with the glory back his age. Review: Of course, this movie has a ton of hype and that the film can live up to all that .... chat conversation. Even if we assume that this movie is kind of disappointing. This film proves that it is not just the special effects made Star Wars fun to watch. It's as if George Lucas was so excited that he can do it with CGI effects, he forgot what made the original trilogy so large letters and symbols. Not a bad movie, but the problem many.-Many people forgive this movie to be boring because they say it is only the first in a trilogy of others, and it just creates all to follow. Wrong wrong wrong, this film is to be its own film in the first place, like the other three films. It is necessary to have good characters and some interesting story .... is did. story revolves around the conflict in trade disputes and fate of this planet Naboo. Does anyone really care about this? The details of the dispute is more clear and does not show the actual generate enough interest for us to root for a particular party. Darth Sideous more important conflict and growth stowed away in the background. We do not know why Darth Maul hate Jedis so .... it just is not. Maybe Lucas wanted Darth Maul to something like Boba Fett (quiet and mysterious). He worked with Boba Fett, because he is not the main villain character support. The film really does not have a clear villain. I wish someone would have the courage and just told Lucas that he is lousy. main story-no one seems most happy in this film. Qui-Gon is really the only character that can be associated with, and he is far enough away. Queen act as a model in many of his scenes (and looks like one). Obi-Wan Kenobi haunts the entire film is useless, and never say anything interesting. The characters never seem to talk about anything except the plot (like the first movie). C3PO and R2-D2 are pretty stupid. Jedi Council is seen as a very cool and buracratic. I will never understand why they write Annakin as a class of students in this film. He has a teenager. Scene Queen is awkward. Not even going to discuss further ... Jar.Various Jar-midochlorians things just seem tacked on. Jokes fall flat, unless your child is still very young. Annakin destroyed at the end of every trading ship and safves, mostly by mistake! ILM and George Lucas seems so happy with their new CGI toys, they spend 95% of their time perfecting them. Frankly, I think the FX in Return of the Jedi is sharper and less cartoon measured. There is nothing memorable apparently not the case here. This film is not as good as the hype, but it can be better than that. I've been waiting for this movie, but I first saw this film, I was really tired in the middle of a good eye it.There. Pod race fun, such as light saber battle at the end. There are some very good special effects throughout. Hopefully Lucas just writers block when writing. Maybe he will remember what he was doing another movie a good time for Episode II. Although he seemed to have broken his name already.
Description: Distinctly odd couple thoughts and motives convince Alan Grant to go to Isla Sorna (the second laboratory enjèn dinosaurs.) As an unexpected landing ... and unexpected new inhabitants on the island. Review: First of all, this is the last episode in the Jurassic series did not deserve all the bad reviews it received when it was released. In fact, it was much more enjoyable than the stupid second JP. This is the same as the first? No, of course not. The original story was easily the best of the three, but I found this movie enjoyable and better than what I was led to believe.The filmmakers were smart in making this short film. People have seen a lot of dinosaurs and now so let's not overdo it ... and they are not just a movie and a half hours (not including the credits.). Who made it short and sweet. We saw some of the reptiles of the month there were a few scares, enjoyed the beautiful scenery of the jungle (filmed in Hawaii), and - bam - on it. the characters were not perfect, nothing is quite annoying, as in the second film. lull featured family to get back together with their search for the missing teen. There is nothing wrong with a good story that.A unfairly maligned and nice, short evening entertainment.
Year: 2008 Genre: Comedy, Romance Director: Peyton Reed Starring: Jim Carrey, Zooey Deschanel, Bradley Cooper
Description: Guy challenges himself to say "yes everything for an entire year. Review: She's happy that you've seen Yes Man, and was pleasantly surprised. Jim Carrey is not my all time favorite (despite comic talent and acting skills), but in this film that seems to have hit spot.The the story itself is really simple: Carl (Jim Carrey), a very negative person, go to meetings Among the very positive Yes charismatic leader (Terence Stamp), says that you should say yes to all questions, and I agree with all the proposals. Carl was reluctant to see it tried, and after meeting with a girl in a scooter (ever so lovely Zooey Deschanel) things start happening around him. But in a 100% positive it can be difficult at times ... It's all very silly, of course - but these feel-good comedy has a low tone of seriousness as well. And have great players, a lot of fantastic scenes relatively relaxed Jim Carrey and lightweight style. Y / N? I say, Y.
Description: As an inventor Andy Brewster is about to embark on the journey of life, according to a quick stop at his mother house to an unexpected cross-country trip with her on the trip. Review: These days, people want their comedies vulgarity. It is not clear how well films do at the box Appatow. Now, Im not saying that I do not like raunchy comedy. In fact, Superbad is one of my favorite movies. Just dont understand why movies like guilt trip to get such negative responses from audiences and critics. Of course, this was not a cinematic masterpiece, but no one was This is 40, and that is more responsive than a guilt trip is.Although I was laughing loud all the way through, the film made me think about my relationship with my mother. I had a great time with the guilt trip and would recommend it to all those who are fed up with today's standards comedy.Funny, Real, and ndershë , m. 7/10 - Thanks for reading.
Year: 1998 Genre: Crime, Thriller Director: Guy Ritchie Starring: Jason Flemyng, Dexter Fletcher, Nick Moran
Description: Four London working class Mastiffs pool their money to put one in a high stakes game of cards in the game, but things go wrong and they end up half a million pounds from having one week to come up with the money. Review: The first time I saw this movie, not only because the idea of ​​the dialogue between the many difficulties was a strange accent, but because the actors spoke so damn fast. But despite that, I was addicted to the word. We review any other movie rental will save about 20 minutes and LS, and 2SB want to go, because my wife is a very good start. LS, and 2SB WellII've've lost count of how many number of times and still looks better to watch this film, you can not put your finger Now he is hooked. The most obvious feature of this film, I am a beautiful, serious and funny at the same time can be coordinated between the two. The characters are two-dimensional. Villains are scary and they look like idiots, and I get the carpet pulled out from under them, the good guys still think that smart. They are always in control of the situation is still projected as cool. Maybe it's about real life.The unique style that can be called a complete stop movie satire. I can be compared to the LS, and 2SB that I can not think of any film. Many people style Pulp Fiction, Goodfellas, Trainspotting and Reservoir Dogs is a combination, but I have a good description of the LS, and 2SB somethingThe only if you really desperate to describe this kind I honestly do not think MTV would be a crime comedy that does not think there is anything wrong with that. For example, music and video, all the non-stop action and healthy. Something is always going on, but without the humor reasonThe music videos, in fact, is still pretty sharp. No one is actually trying to be funny, unusual, however, more humor, sure, you are going to a menacingly balance between serious and funny. LS, and 2SB I'm really disappointed in the people that I think, so a couple. If you are waiting belly laugh, Leslie Nielsen, Jim Carrey, Steve Martin, all type of comedy or serious Al Pacino, Andy Garcia, typecasted, DeNiro crime thriller typecasted, BC this movie to find your favorite characters down.My upload Rory Breaker (VAS Blackwood), Big Chris (Vinnie Jones), a two-dimensional over-the-top characters, the most obvious CU, NCA. Big Chris takes his son with him to collect a debt, and he and his son Rory Breaker chastises him in front of the other can lead to the taking of a person who claims, even the most chaotic drug does not have a great reputation withi unique camera work of the Lord, speaker blowing soundtrack, the threaded area is beautiful, the perfect end to the grittiest visuals I've seen. Stuffed sky scrapers you see any kind of reflective glass or city shots, incredible special effects have become accustomed. I've never heard of this film, the actor, you can go back and repeat the dialogue to understand, they were guilty of the destruction of the buildings that look, wouldnt even scrap a car is probably one of Hollywood make-up with one of the most used in the film, there is no love scenes or romance, or even a complicated relationship, "with Oscar-worthy performances, and that our budget entertainmentWhere great movies based on conventional budgets, human talent to work in the film, but the film aloneIf 10 to 10, there's something more this Itand ......... ...... This is an emotional
Year: 2009 Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi Director: Roland Emmerich Starring: John Cusack, Amanda Peet, Chiwetel Ejiofor
Description: Then the world came to an end with the heroic struggle of the survivors, he says, is an epic adventure about a global disaster. Review: They had all the money, the actors and the special effects are needed, how they manage to screw it? Obviously they thought they were coming out now more important than developing deeper characters and this is the reason why this story had great potential stayed so shallow. The dialog was always cheesy and none of the characters in this film really showed any real emotion or put any of these symptoms, chills providing public. Another thing that really bothered me was that so bad about giving time. Every second of the film had a close connection that made the film seem completely unrealistic. Examples are airplanes taking off just before the collapse of the track or drive fast enough to not get hit by the explosion. It can be very cool if it does not happen 100% of the time, and I have never seen a film that explores how to create excitement in this range. So, to summarize: If you feel as if your brain out and see special effects and big explosions with very shallow plot, then this movie is for you. But if you feel like watching a movie with a certain depth and then Jita see something else.
24 
3
